Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 1900X outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 3 3200G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 1900X is 675 days older than the cheaper Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen 3 3200G - 103 vs 101 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 16 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Up to 59% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €74.07 vs €180.0
- Up to 58% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - €0.73 vs €1.75 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 65 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.75/FPS
41%
Price, €
€180
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12979 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
101
98%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
100%
Price, €
€74.07
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €74.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12979 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Aug 31st, 2017 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Ryzen Threadripper | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Whitehaven | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3r2 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 4 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |