Buy on Amazon
€292.83
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 115 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 142% better in League of Legends than Ryzen 3 3250U - 206 vs 85 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 20 vs 4 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
206
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€292.83
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i9-10900F (Basistakt: 2,80GHz; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110900F
Buy for €292.83 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 25 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Ryzen 3 3250U
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Core i9-10900F
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i9 |
| Picasso | Codename | Comet Lake |
| AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 10 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
