Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Ryzen 3 3250U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 995 days newer than Ryzen 3 3250U.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3250U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 15 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 31% better in Lost Ark than Ryzen 3 3250U - 306 vs 233 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3250U - 20 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
306
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.89/FPS
100%
Price, €
€273.59
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €273.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18102 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3250U | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 6th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Picasso | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket FP5 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 14 |
4 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |