Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Ryzen 3 3100 outperforms the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Ryzen 3 3100 is 988 days newer than the more expensive Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3100
- Performs up to 11% better in War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 184 vs 166 FPS
- Up to 84% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €56.96 vs €351.03
- Up to 85% better value when playing War Thunder than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - €0.31 vs €2.11 per FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3100 - 24 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
FPS
184
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€56.96
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €56.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
166
90%
Value, €/FPS
€2.11/FPS
14%
Price, €
€351.03
16%
Buy for €351.03 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 97 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 3 3100 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 24th, 2020 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
Ryzen 3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Matisse | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |