Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 1940 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 45% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €219.97 vs €399.99
- Up to 40% better value when playing Hogwarts Legacy than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - €2.82 vs €4.71 per FPS
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 9% better in Hogwarts Legacy than FX-9370 - 85 vs 78 FPS
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 180 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 24 vs 8 threads
Hogwarts Legacy
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
85
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.71/FPS
59%
Price, €
€399.99
54%
FPS Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 39 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Vishera | Codename | Colfax |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |