Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-9370 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-9370 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 2515 days newer than the cheaper FX-9370.
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Up to 31% cheaper than Core i9-10900KF - €219.97 vs €319.57
- Up to 27% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i9-10900KF - €1.52 vs €2.08 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 6% better in Dead Space than FX-9370 - 154 vs 145 FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €219.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.08/FPS
73%
Price, €
€319.57
68%
FPS Winner
Buy for €319.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 89 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i9 |
Vishera | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
220 W | TDP | 125 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |