Key Differences
In short — Core i7-6800K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-6800K is 1555 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 66% cheaper than Core i7-6800K - €42.6 vs €126.25
- Up to 63% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Core i7-6800K - €0.27 vs €0.73 per FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Core i7-6800K - 125 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-6800K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6800K
- Performs up to 12% better in Resident Evil 4 than FX-6200 - 173 vs 155 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 142 minutes ago
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
FPS
173
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.73/FPS
36%
Price, €
€126.25
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for €126.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • May 31st, 2016
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i7-6800K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | May 31st, 2016 |
FX | Collection | Core i7 |
Zambezi | Codename | Broadwell-E |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 140 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |