Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600K is 2426 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i5-9600K - €42.6 vs €209.12
- Up to 78% better value when playing ARK: Survival Evolved than Core i5-9600K - €0.37 vs €1.67 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600K
- Performs up to 8% better in ARK: Survival Evolved than FX-6200 - 125 vs 116 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
ARK: Survival Evolved
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 154 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
125
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.67/FPS
22%
Price, €
€209.12
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for €209.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 155 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |