Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600K is 2047 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 82% cheaper than Core i5-8600K - €42.6 vs €242.73
- Up to 81% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-8600K - €0.2 vs €1.07 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600K doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600K
- Performs up to 7% better in Death Stranding than FX-6200 - 227 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 95 vs 125 Watts
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 464 minutes ago
Buy for €242.73 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 465 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 5th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-8600K |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 5th, 2017 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Coffee Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 6 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |