Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 3305 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - €42.6 vs €135.96
- Up to 66% better value when playing Death Stranding than Core i5-11500 - €0.2 vs €0.58 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 10% better in Death Stranding than FX-6200 - 234 vs 213 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 12 vs 6 threads
Death Stranding
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 90 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.58/FPS
34%
Price, €
€135.96
31%
FPS Winner
Buy for €135.96 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 91 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6200 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Feb 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
FX | Collection | Core i5 |
Zambezi | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
3 | Cores | 6 |
6 | Threads | 12 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |