Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 2803 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 5% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than FX-4130 - 176 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4130 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
176
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.13/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.5
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 403 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Aug 27th, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4130 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |