Key Differences
In short — FX-9370 outperforms FX-4130 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9370 is 288 days newer than FX-4130.
Advantages of AMD FX-4130
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9370
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than FX-4130 - 191 vs 190 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4130 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
Buy for €179.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 92 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
AMD FX-4130 | vs | AMD FX-9370 |
---|---|---|
Aug 27th, 2012 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
FX | Collection | FX |
Zambezi | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |