Buy on Amazon
€209.97
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11600KF outperforms the more expensive FX-9370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11600KF is 2835 days newer than the more expensive FX-9370.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600KF
- Performs up to 11% better in The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - 142 vs 128 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than FX-9370 - €154.89 vs €209.97
- Up to 34% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than FX-9370 - €1.09 vs €1.64 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than AMD FX-9370 - 125 vs 220 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-9370 - 12 vs 8 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Amd FX-9370 Black Edition - 4,4 GHz - Sockel AM3+ (FD9370FHHKWOX)
Buy for €209.97 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18829 minutes ago
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€154.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-11600KF 11. Generation Desktop Prozessor (Basistakt: 3.9GHz Tuboboost: 4.9GHz, 6 Kerne, LGA1200) BX8070811600KF
Buy for €154.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 18830 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FX-9370
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Core i5-11600KF
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-9370 | vs | Intel Core i5-11600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 11th, 2013 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| FX | Collection | Core i5 |
| Vishera | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
4.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
| 4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 220 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 22.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
