Key Differences
In short — Celeron G540 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G540 is 38 days older than FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Performs up to 0% better in Minecraft than FX-4100 - 595 vs 594 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
FX-4100
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
|---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
| FX | Collection | Celeron |
| Zambezi | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
| AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 95 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
