Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1100 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 8% better in New World than Celeron G540 - 105 vs 97 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 12 vs 2 threads
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
