Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is 2773 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
- Performs up to 13% better in Dota 2 than Celeron G540 - 185 vs 164 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 15 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Dota 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Best Looking
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| 65 W | TDP | 15 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
| Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
