Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11600K outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-11600K is 1356 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11600K - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11600K
- Performs up to 17% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than EPYC 7551P - 204 vs 175 FPS
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 125 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
204
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€208.89
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €208.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 123 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i5-11600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Rocket Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |