Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 1600 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 1600 is 79 days older than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 1600 - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 1600
- Performs up to 3% better in New World than EPYC 7551P - 107 vs 104 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
FPS
107
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.93/FPS
100%
Price, €
€99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13000 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 11th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 1600 |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 11th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Naples | Codename | Summit Ridge |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |