Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10400F outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10400F is 1036 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-10400F - 64 vs 12 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10400F
- Performs up to 21% better in War Thunder than EPYC 7551P - 182 vs 151 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
182
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.5/FPS
100%
Price, €
€90.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €90.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1522 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i5-10400F |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
Naples | Codename | Comet Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 6 |
64 | Threads | 12 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
180 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |