Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 2015 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-13100F - 64 vs 8 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than EPYC 7551P - 219 vs 197 FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
219
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.43/FPS
100%
Price, €
€95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 57265 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Single-Core
895
39.28884986830553%
Multi-Core
6225
80.41596692933729%
AMD EPYC 7551P | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
---|---|---|
Jun 29th, 2017 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
Naples | Codename | Raptor Lake |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
32 | Cores | 4 |
64 | Threads | 8 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
180 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |