Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900HX outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900HX is 1615 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900HX
- Performs up to 29% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than EPYC 7282 - 160 vs 124 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-14900HX
Mobile • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-14900HX |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel BGA 1964 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
| 16 | Cores | 24 |
| 32 | Threads | 32 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.2 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.8 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 22.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
