Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 7640HS outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 7640HS is 1268 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS
- Performs up to 30% better in Dirt 5 than EPYC 7282 - 226 vs 174 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 5 7640HS
Mobile • Jan 26th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 7640HS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 26th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Rome | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 43.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 760M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
