Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8840HS outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8840HS is 1582 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS - 32 vs 16 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS
- Performs up to 3% better in Stray than EPYC 7282 - 189 vs 183 FPS
- Consumes up to 77% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 28 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Ryzen 7 8840HS
Mobile • Dec 6th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1248
50.40387722132472%
Multi-Core
9071
85.81835383159886%
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Dec 6th, 2023 |
| EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Rome | Codename | Not Available |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket FP8 |
Server | Segment | Mobile |
16 | Cores | 8 |
32 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 28 W |
| 7 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
| No | Overclockable | No |
