Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900T outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900T is 881 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-12900T - 32 vs 24 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900T
- Performs up to 7% better in Forza Horizon 4 than EPYC 7282 - 330 vs 308 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i9-12900T
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Single-Core
1248
53.106382978723396%
Multi-Core
9071
74.328089151098%
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900T |
|---|---|---|
| Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i9 |
| Rome | Codename | Alder Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 16 | Cores | 16 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 1.4 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | Not Available |
7 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 14.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
