Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 3915 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 11% better in Valorant than Core i7-965 - 759 vs 686 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than Intel Core i7-965 - 120 vs 130 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i7-965 - 32 vs 8 threads
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11017 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
EPYC | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Rome | Codename | Bloomfield |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 130 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |