Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Ryzen 3 3200G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 31 days newer than Ryzen 3 3200G.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 3% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Ryzen 3 3200G - 171 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 3 3200G - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
166
97%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.55
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €63.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 11014 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Rome | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |