Buy on Amazon
€151.36
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9400F outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9400F is 211 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-9400F - 32 vs 6 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9400F
- Performs up to 2% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than EPYC 7282 - 131 vs 129 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
131
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€151.36
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel BX80684I59400F CORE I5-9400F 2.90GHZ SKT1151 9MB CACHE BOXED :: (Komponenten> Prozessoren CPU)
Buy for €151.36 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4246 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i5-9400F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i5-9400F |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i5 |
| Rome | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
| 120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
