Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G is 349 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G
- Performs up to 2% better in World of Tanks than EPYC 7282 - 538 vs 528 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
FPS
538
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€121.54
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €121.54 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Jul 21st, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 4650G |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Jul 21st, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rome | Codename | Renoir |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | No |