Buy on Amazon
€125.21
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6300 outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6300 is 1436 days older than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6300 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6300
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than EPYC 7282 - 540 vs 539 FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 51 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7282 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
540
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€125.21
100%
FPS and Value Winner
INTEL Core i3-6300 3,8GHz LGA1151 4MB Cache Tray CPU
Buy for €125.21 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 98 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
EPYC 7282
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Core i3-6300
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | Intel Core i3-6300 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
| EPYC | Collection | Core i3 |
| Rome | Codename | Skylake |
| AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 120 W | TDP | 51 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
