Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600X outperforms EPYC 7282 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600X is 456 days newer than EPYC 7282.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 5600X - 32 vs 12 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600X
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EPYC 7282 - 144 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD EPYC 7282 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
144
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.02/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Rome | Codename | Vermeer |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 65 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |