Key Differences
In short — EPYC 7282 outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1920X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing EPYC 7282 is 727 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X.
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7282
- Performs up to 1% better in Elden Ring than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 120 vs 119 FPS
- Consumes up to 33% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 120 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X - 32 vs 24 threads
Elden Ring
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
FPS
119
99%
Value, €/FPS
€3.19/FPS
100%
Price, €
€379.64
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €379.64 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 22 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Server/Workstation • Aug 7th, 2019
Desktop • Aug 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD EPYC 7282 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
---|---|---|
Aug 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2017 |
EPYC | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Rome | Codename | Whitehaven |
AMD Socket SP3 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 12 |
32 | Threads | 24 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
120 W | TDP | 180 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |