Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Athlon 3000G outperforms the more expensive FX-8350 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Athlon 3000G is 2584 days newer than the more expensive FX-8350.
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Performs up to 8% better in World of Warcraft than FX-8350 - 169 vs 156 FPS
- Up to 58% cheaper than FX-8350 - €65.0 vs €155.88
- Up to 62% better value when playing World of Warcraft than FX-8350 - €0.38 vs €1.0 per FPS
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 8 vs 4 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
FPS
169
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.38/FPS
100%
Price, €
€65
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 131 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Athlon 3000G | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Nov 20th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Athlon | Collection | FX |
Picasso | Codename | Vishera |
AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
Radeon Vega 3 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |