Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — GameMachines Cube - outperforms the more expensive Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC
- Performs up to 14% better in War Thunder than Captiva - 272 vs 238 FPS
- Up to 1% cheaper than Captiva - €1729.0 vs €1749.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing War Thunder than Captiva - €6.36 vs €7.35 per FPS
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Buy for €1,749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 870 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
272
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.36/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1729
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 868 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
4th Variation
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
4th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
85.44537815126051%
Multi-Core
14881
77.36820214204013%
7th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
Captiva PC | vs | GameMachines Cube - Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
