Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Kiebel outperforms the cheaper Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Up to 6% cheaper than Kiebel - €1789.0 vs €1899.0
Advantages of Kiebel Gaming PC
- Performs up to 12% better in Rocket League than Captiva - 521 vs 465 FPS
- Up to 5% better value when playing Rocket League than Captiva - €3.64 vs €3.85 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
4th Variation
FPS
465
89.25143953934742%
Value, €/FPS
€3.85/FPS
94.54545454545455%
Price, €
€1789
100%
Buy for €1,789 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74861 minutes ago
14th Variation
FPS
521
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.64/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1899
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74857 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
4th Variation
14th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
80%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
82.14285714285714%
14th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
14th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
Captiva PC | vs | Kiebel Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Core i9-12900KF |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
