Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Memory outperforms the more expensive Captiva on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Memory PC
- Performs up to 2% better in Deathloop than Captiva - 128 vs 125 FPS
- Up to 31% cheaper than Captiva - €1389.0 vs €2009.0
- Up to 32% better value when playing Deathloop than Captiva - €10.85 vs €16.07 per FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €2,009 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 600 minutes ago
Buy for €1,389 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 598 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
7th Variation
452nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
67.89541363051865%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
78.08641975308642%
452nd Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
452nd Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
83.43823760818253%
Multi-Core
9729
65.37867078825347%
Captiva PC | vs | Memory PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | Radeon RX 7800 XT |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
