Key Differences
In short — Captiva outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Captiva PC
- Performs up to 16% better in League of Legends than Megaport - 313 vs 270 FPS
Advantages of Megaport Gaming PC
- Up to 16% cheaper than Captiva - €1679.0 vs €2009.0
- Up to 3% better value when playing League of Legends than Captiva - €6.22 vs €6.42 per FPS
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €2,009 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 239 minutes ago
43rd Variation
FPS
270
86.26198083067092%
Value, €/FPS
€6.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1679
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,679 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
7th Variation
43rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
63.20830007980847%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
66.09579100145137%
43rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
250.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
689 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Core i9-12900KF
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2542
100%
Multi-Core
14881
100%
CPU Winner
43rd Variation
Ryzen 7 5800X
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2178
85.68056648308419%
Multi-Core
10263
68.96713930515422%
Captiva PC | vs | Megaport Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-12900KF | CPU | Ryzen 7 5800X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Ti SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
