Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 46% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - €1199.00 vs €2226.57
- Up to 45% better value when playing Resident Evil 4 than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - €12.23 vs €22.05 per FPS
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 3% better in Resident Evil 4 than TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 - 101 vs 98 FPS
Resident Evil 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 777 minutes ago
FPS
101
100%
Value, €/FPS
€22.05/FPS
55%
Price, €
€2226.57
53%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,226.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 775 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 500 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
