Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Horizon Zero Dawn than TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 - 108 vs 103 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 54% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - €1029.00 vs €2226.57
- Up to 52% better value when playing Horizon Zero Dawn than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - €9.99 vs €20.62 per FPS
Horizon Zero Dawn
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
FPS
108
100%
Value, €/FPS
€20.62/FPS
48%
Price, €
€2226.57
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,226.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4708 minutes ago
Buy for €1,029 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4710 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultimate
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.3 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 22nd, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
