Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 5% better in Rocket League than TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 - 359 vs 342 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 49% cheaper than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - €1089.00 vs €2143.39
- Up to 47% better value when playing Rocket League than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) - €3.18 vs €5.97 per FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
FPS
359
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.97/FPS
53%
Price, €
€2143.39
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,143.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 206 minutes ago
Buy for €1,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 208 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 22nd, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
