Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE AORUS 16X outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 35% cheaper than GIGABYTE AORUS 16X - €1309.0 vs €1999.0
- Up to 24% better value when playing God of War than GIGABYTE AORUS 16X - €16.78 vs €21.97 per FPS
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 17% better in God of War than TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 - 91 vs 78 FPS
God of War
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12348 minutes ago
Feb 28th, 2024
FPS
91
100%
Value, €/FPS
€21.97/FPS
76%
Price, €
€1999
65%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12348 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
Feb 28th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 28th, 2024
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop | vs | GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Feb 28th, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
