Key Differences
In short — GIGABYTE AORUS 16X outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 33% cheaper than GIGABYTE AORUS 16X - €1199.0 vs €1799.0
- Up to 27% better value when playing Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than GIGABYTE AORUS 16X - €11.1 vs €15.12 per FPS
Advantages of GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 10% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 - 119 vs 108 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74 minutes ago
Feb 28th, 2024
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.12/FPS
73%
Price, €
€1799
66%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 66575 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
Feb 28th, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 28th, 2024
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
TULPAR T7 V20.6.2 Gaming Laptop | vs | GIGABYTE AORUS 16X Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Feb 28th, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 500 GB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
