Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 outperforms the cheaper ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim Laptop
- Up to 27% cheaper than TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 - €954.07 vs €1309.0
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 226% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim - 101 vs 31 FPS
- Up to 58% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim - €12.96 vs €30.78 per FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Sep 1st, 2021
FPS
31
30%
Value, €/FPS
€30.78/FPS
42%
Price, €
€954.07
100%
Buy for €954.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16328 minutes ago
FPS
101
100%
Value, €/FPS
€12.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1309
72%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,309 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 16328 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Sep 1st, 2021
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
39%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
39%
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Sep 1st, 2021
Core i5-11300H
3.1 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1689
64%
Multi-Core
4940
33%
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim Laptop | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2021 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i5-11300H | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
