Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) outperforms ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) is 873 days newer than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 4000% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim - 41 vs 1 FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Currently N/A on Amazon
Out of Stock
Updated 263 minutes ago
FPS
41
100%
Value, €/FPS
€54.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€2226.57
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €2,226.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1072 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Sep 1st, 2021
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Sep 1st, 2021
GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
36 GPixel/s
44%
Texel Fillrate
72 GTexel/s
29%
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Sep 1st, 2021
Core i5-11300H
3.1 GHz | 4-core
Single-Core
1689
70%
Multi-Core
4940
43%
ASUS VivoBook Pro 15 OLED Slim Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 (PTN16-51-978P) Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 22nd, 2024 |
| Core i5-11300H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce GTX 1650 Max-Q | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 8 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
