Key Differences
In short — Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 62% cheaper than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- - €1089.0 vs €2899.0
- Up to 57% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll- - €10.78 vs €24.99 per FPS
Advantages of Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll Gaming- Laptop
- Performs up to 15% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 - 116 vs 101 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €1,089 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 258 minutes ago
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 5th Variation
FPS
116
100%
Value, €/FPS
€24.99/FPS
43%
Price, €
€2899
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 257 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 5th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Jan 23rd, 2024 • 5th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
null-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
TULPAR T7 V20.6.1 Gaming Laptop | vs | Razer Blade 16 (2024) - 16 Zoll Gaming- Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Jan 23rd, 2024 |
| Core i7-13700 | CPU | Core i9-14900HX |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 2560x1440 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 240 Hz |
| 15.6" | Screen Size | 16" |
