Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 3461 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Consumes up to 38% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 77 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Escape From Tarkov than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 229 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 24 vs 8 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
229
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.73/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$397.18
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$397.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |