Key Differences
In short — Core i5-12400 outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-12400 is 3522 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Core i5-12400
- Performs up to 65% better in War Thunder than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 230 vs 139 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i5-12400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Core i5-12400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
| 8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
