Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 3600 outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 3600 is 2610 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 5 3600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen 5 3600
- Performs up to 3% better in Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 219 vs 212 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 65 vs 77 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 12 vs 8 threads
Star Wars Jedi: Fallen Order
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
219
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.77/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$167.8
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$167.8 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Ryzen 5 3600 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 12 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
77 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |