Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms the cheaper Core i5-13400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-13400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 426 days older than the cheaper Core i5-13400F.
Advantages of Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 3% better in Overwatch 2 than Core i5-13400F - 394 vs 383 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-13400F - 24 vs 16 threads
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Up to 32% cheaper than Core i9-12900KF - CA$271.20 vs CA$399.17
- Up to 30% better value when playing Overwatch 2 than Core i9-12900KF - CA$0.71 vs CA$1.01 per FPS
Overwatch 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
394
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$1.01/FPS
70%
Price, CA$
CA$399.17
67%
FPS Winner
Buy for CA$399.17 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6695 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
383
97%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$271.2
100%
Value Winner
Buy for CA$271.2 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6695 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i9-12900KF | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 10 |
24 | Threads | 16 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
125 W | TDP | Not Available |
10 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |