Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon W3670 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 4146 days newer than Xeon W3670.
Advantages of Intel Xeon W3670
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in Alan Wake 2 than Xeon W3670 - 116 vs 99 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon W3670 doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
116
100%
Value, CA$/FPS
CA$0.97/FPS
100%
Price, CA$
CA$112.98
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for CA$112.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 160 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Aug 29th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon W3670 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Aug 29th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon | Collection | Celeron |
Westmere-EP | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 1366 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
130 W | TDP | Not Available |
32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |