Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2699A v4 outperforms Athlon 3000G on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2699A v4 is 1121 days older than Athlon 3000G.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4
- Performs up to 2% better in No Man's Sky than Athlon 3000G - 170 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Athlon 3000G - 44 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD Athlon 3000G
- Consumes up to 76% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 - 35 vs 145 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 doesn't have integrated graphics
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Desktop • Oct 25th, 2016
Athlon 3000G
Desktop • Nov 20th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2699A v4 | vs | AMD Athlon 3000G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 25th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 20th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Athlon |
| Broadwell | Codename | Picasso |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
22 | Cores | 2 |
44 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| 145 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 3 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
